Contemporary Research Analysis Journal

In the context of fundamental and comprehensive reform of general education in Vietnam, managing changes in teaching activities (TA) in high schools has become an urgent requirement. This study focuses on analyzing the factors influencing the management of TA changes based on Michael Fullan’s model. Grounded in the theoretical framework of three stages of change (initiation, implementation, and institutionalization) along with core principles, the paper highlights that the success of change depends on a combination of multiple factors: (1) leadership roles and strategic vision in initiating, coordinating, and sustaining innovation; (2) human factors, including teachers’ readiness, competence, and beliefs, together with active student participation; (3) organizational factors, reflected in flexible management structures and a collaborative school culture; and (4) contextual factors, particularly policies, resources, and support from families and communities. The research findings contribute to providing scientific arguments for school management, affirming that applying Fullan’s model enhances the effectiveness of teaching innovation in alignment with the General Education Curriculum 2018 and the trend of international integration.

Change management; Teaching activities; High school; Fullan’s model; General Education Curriculum 2018

1. Bảo, Đặng Quốc (2021). Quản lý sự thay đổi giáo dục trong bối cảnh đổi mới căn bản, toàn diện [Managing educational change in the context of fundamental and comprehensive reform]. Tạp chí Quản lý Giáo dục [Journal of Educational Management], 13(3), 11–18.
2. Bình, Nguyễn Thị (2020). Quản lý sự thay đổi trong hoạt động dạy học ở trường phổ thông theo tiếp cận năng lực [Managing change in teaching activities in general schools under a competency-based approach]. Tạp chí Khoa học Giáo dục [Journal of Educational Science], 16(2), 45–52.
3. Bộ Giáo dục và Đào tạo. (2018). Chương trình giáo dục phổ thông tổng thể [General Education Curriculum]. Hanoi: Vietnam Education Publishing House.
4. Bridges, W. (2009). Managing transitions: Making the most of change (3rd ed.). Da Capo Press.
5. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
6. Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
8. Fullan, M., & Quinn, J. (2016). Coherence: The right drivers in action for schools, districts, and systems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
9. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
10. Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2012). The global fourth way: The quest for educational excellence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
11. Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
12. Kotter, J. P. (2012). Accelerate: Building strategic agility for a faster-moving world. Harvard Business Review Press.
13. Prosci. (2018). ADKAR: A model for change in business, government, and our community (2nd ed.). Prosci Research.
14. Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8