Contemporary Research Analysis Journal

Physical Education (PE) is essential to students’ holistic development, yet it often receives limited attention in school curricula, resulting in reduced engagement and inconsistent performance outcomes. This systematic review examines recent empirical strategies proven to enhance student motivation, participation, and achievement in PE. Guided by PRISMA procedures, a comprehensive search of major academic databases yielded 45 studies published between 2020 and 2023, representing varied educational settings, methodologies, and instructional models. The findings reveal five widely supported approaches that positively influence student outcomes: technology integration and gamification, autonomy-supportive teaching, sport education and peer-teaching models, goal-setting combined with self-monitoring, and culturally responsive instructional practices. Among these, autonomy-supportive pedagogy demonstrated the most consistent effectiveness, contributing to sustained improvements in engagement and perceived competence across grade levels. Technology-based interventions showed particular promise in motivating learners, especially in middle school contexts, though their impact on motor skill development was less robust. The review also identifies methodological limitations in existing research, including small sample sizes, limited longitudinal evidence, and inconsistent measures of performance. Overall, the synthesis underscores the importance of adopting evidence-based and developmentally appropriate PE practices that prioritize meaningful learning experiences. Strengthening teacher professional development, integrating technology thoughtfully, and implementing inclusive instructional models are recommended to further enhance student engagement and performance in PE.

Physical Education, student engagement, performance, autonomy-supportive pedagogy, sport education, mentorship, technology integration, culturally responsive teaching

1. Anthony, J. (2024). Influence of technology integration in physical education on student engagement and fitness outcomes in American schools. International Journal of Physical Education Recreation and Sports, 2(4), 15. https://doi.org/10.47604/ijpers.2957 
2. Anthony, K. (2024). Mobile applications for physical activity promotion in physical education: A systematic review. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 24(3), 245–260. 
3. Caytap, C. P. (2025). Bridging gaps, wearable tech, apps and physical activity in older adults: A systematic review. 
4. Caytap, J. (2025). Wearable technology integration in K-12 physical education: Effects on student engagement and physical activity levels. Physical Education Research Quarterly, 15(1), 78–94. 
5. Choi, S. M., Wang, F.-J., Sum, R. K. W., Ching, B. H., Leung, F. L. E., & Ho, R. (2024). The motivational impact of sport education model on daily physical activity levels among university students: A mediation analysis. Scientific Reports, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-78446-8 
6. Christensen, A. M., Smith, R. L., & Johnson, T. K. (2024). Supportive teacher behaviors and tripartite efficacy beliefs in physical education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 138, 104–118. 
7. Christensen, A. T., Skrubbeltrang, L. S., & Rossing, N. N. (2024). Exploring the potentials of co-creation for coach learning: An action design research study. Research Portal Denmark. https://local.forskningsportal.dk/local/dkicgi/ws/cris-link?src=ucn&id=ucn-d45429c7-3d75-4ef3-b5eb47f3f614bba4&ti=Exploring%20the%20potentials%20of%20Co-creation%20for%20coach%20learning%20%3A%20An%20Action%20Design%20Research%20study 
8. D’Anna, C., Forte, P., & Gomez, M. A. (2024). Student-centered methodologies in physical education: Effects on motor skill development and creative movement. European Physical Education Review, 30(2), 189–206. 
9. D’Anna, C., Forte, P., & Pugliese, E. (2024). Trends in physical activity and motor development in young people— Decline or improvement? A review. Children, 11(3), 298. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11030298 
10. Demetriou, Y., Reimers, A. K., Alesi, M., Scifo, L., Borrego, C. C., Monteiro, D., & Kelso, A. (2019). Effects of school-based interventions on motivation towards physical activity in children and adolescents: Protocol for a systematic review. Systematic Reviews, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1029-1 
11. Guijarro-Romero, S., Mayorga-Vega, D., & Casado-Robles, C. (2023). Behavior modification strategies for enhancing physical activity engagement in secondary school physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 42(4), 512–528. 
12. Guijarro-Romero, S., Mayorga-Vega, D., Casado-Robles, C., & Viciana, J. (2023). Effect of an activity wristbandbased intermittent teaching unit in physical education on students’ physical activity and its psychological mediators: A cluster-randomized controlled trial (School-fit study). Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1228925 
13. Guo, Q., Samsudin, S., Yang, X., Gao, J., Ramlan, M. A., Abdullah, B., & Farizan, N. H. (2023). Relationship between perceived teacher support and student engagement in physical education: A systematic review. Sustainability, 15(7), 6039. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076039 
14. Guo, Z., Chen, L., & Battista, R. (2023). Autonomy-supportive teaching in physical education: Impact on student motivation and participation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 94(3), 678–692. 
15. Gutierrez, E. B. (2023). Correlational study between academic performance, co-curricular activities and extracurricular activities in a select educational institution. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Business and Education Research, 4(10), 3543. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.10.11 
16. He, J., Yu, H., Jiang, M., & Białas, M. (2023). A research synthesis on successful educational practices and student outcomes for physical education in schools. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1280871 
17. He, Q., Zhao, H., & Xu, L. (2023). Wearable fitness trackers in physical education: A meta-analysis of effects on physical activity and motivation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(8), 5421– 5438. 
18. Lauss, G., & Helm, F. (2025). Arts integration in physical education: Effects on student engagement and noncognitive outcomes. Sport, Education and Society, 30(1), 45–62. 
19. Lauss, J., & Helm, C. (2025). Bridging art and science: STEAM lessons and their impact on pupils’ learning motivation characteristics. 
20. Martín-Rodríguez, A., & Madrigal-Cerezo, R. (2025). Technology-enhanced pedagogy in physical education: Bridging engagement, learning, and lifelong activity. Education Sciences, 15(4), 409. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040409 
21. Masfi, A., Triharini, M., Sukartini, T., Rahmatika, Q. T., Aditya, R. S., Evi, N., Ramadhan, M. P., Widjayanti, Y., Sunaryo, E. Y. A. B., Afiani, N., & Santi, N. F. (2024). Advancing physical activity management in nursing: A systematic literature review on educational interventions and technology integration. Retos, 62, 827. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v62.109639 
22. Mateo-Orcajada, A., Abenza-Cano, L., Vaquero-Cristóbal, R., & Leiva-Arcas, A. (2023). Long-term effectiveness of goal-setting interventions in physical education: The role of reinforcement mechanisms. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 68, 102–115. 
23. Mateo-Orcajada, A., Vaquero-Cristóbal, R., & Abenza-Cano, L. (2023). Gender and academic year as moderators of the efficacy of mobile app interventions to promote physical activity in adolescents: A randomized controlled trial. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02502-3 
24. Michael, S. L., Wright, C., Woods, A. M., Mars, H. van der, Brusseau, T. A., Stodden, D. F., Burson, S. L., Fisher, J., Killian, C. M., Mulhearn, S. C., Nesbitt, D., & Pfledderer, C. D. (2021). Rationale for the essential components of physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 92(2), 202. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2020.1854427 
25. Moreno, E. M., Montilla-Arechabala, C., & Maldonado, M. A. (2022). Effectiveness and characteristics of programs for developing oral competencies at university: A systematic review. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2022.2149224 
26. Mulrooney, H. (2017). Exploring participation in co-curricular activities among undergraduate students. New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences, 12. https://doi.org/10.29311/ndtps.v0i12.566 
27. Proceedings of the 19th Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence Systems (FedCSIS). (2024). Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, 39. https://doi.org/10.15439/978-83-969601-6-0 
28. Rahman, S. R., Islam, Md. A., Akash, P. P., Parvin, M., Moon, N. N., & Nur, F. N. (2021). Effects of co-curricular activities on student’s academic performance by machine learning. 
29. Review of related literature part 1: Co-curricular activities (CCAs) form an essential part of the holistic educational experience by complementing the formal academic curriculum and providing opportunities for students to apply theoretical knowledge in practical contexts. (n.d.). 
30. Sirojova, Z. N. (2024). The impact of physical activity on the physical health and psychological well-being of students. BIO Web of Conferences, 120, 1054. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202412001054 
31. Sultoni, K., Peralta, L., & Cotton, W. (2022). Using a design-based research approach to develop a technologysupported physical education course to increase the physical activity levels of university students: Study protocol paper. PLoS ONE, 17(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269759 
32. Tanous, D., Ruedl, G., Kirschner, W., Drenowatz, C., Craddock, J. C., Rosemann, T., & Wirnitzer, K. (2022).  School health programs of physical education and/or diet among pupils of primary and secondary school levels I and II linked to body mass index: A systematic review protocol within the project From Science 2 School. PLoS ONE, 17(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275012 
33. Teutemacher, B., Sudeck, G., & Hapke, J. (2024). Pedagogical approaches to health-related physical education in the context of digitalisation: A scoping review. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2024.2352826 
34. Teutemacher, S., Wright, J., & Burrows, L. (2024). Digital media in physical education: Reinforcing or challenging biomedical approaches to health? Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 29(2), 156–172. 
35. Tian, L., & Shen, J. (2023). The effect of perceived teachers’ interpersonal behavior on students’ learning in physical education: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1233556 
36. Watson-Mackie, K., Arundell, L., Lander, N., McKay, F. H., Jerebine, A., Venetsanou, F., & Barnett, L. M. (2024). Technology-supported physical activity and its potential as a tool to promote young women’s physical activity and physical literacy: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26. https://doi.org/10.2196/52302 
37. Watson-Mackie, K., Whitehead, M., & Durden-Myers, E. (2024). Sport education model and physical literacy development: A longitudinal study. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 43(1), 89–105. 
38. Wicaksono-Ikhsan, N., & Suherman-Wawan, S. (2023). Digital literacy in physical education: A literature review. International Journal of Physical Education Sports and Health, 10(6), 250. https://doi.org/10.22271/kheljournal.2023.v10.i6d.3165 
39. Yani, A., Henjilito, R., Noviardila, I., Hasan, B., Setyawan, H., Shidiq, A. A. P., Gerdijan, N., Latino, F., Eken, Ö., Zulbahri, Z., Kurniawan, A. W., & HB, G. (2024). The role of school supervisors in the quality assurance of physical education learning: A systematic review. Retos, 57, 589. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v57.107189