Rethinking Human Responsibility and Accountability in AI-Driven Decision–Making: Implications for Girl Child Education in Nigerian Secondary Schools

Author's Information:

Akporehe, Ataphia Dorah

Department of Educational Management and Foundations, Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria

Akporehe, Ogheneochuko Jude

Department of Applied Geophysics, Federal University of Petroleum, Effurun, Nigeria

Vol 02 No 12 (2025):Volume 02 Issue 12 December 2025

Page No.: 816-824

Abstract:

Developments for the good of mankind are ever welcomed in any sphere of life, and the education sector is not left out. Educational technology has led to the emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI), which is undoubtedly beneficial for research, teaching, and learning. Still, it must be well applied to benefit all users, especially the girl child. The integration of AI in education presents opportunities and challenges for girls' education in Nigeria, where access to quality education remains a significant concern. This concern should be put on the front burner whenever AI education policies, especially those related to the equalisation of education, are being developed. This study investigates how AI-driven decision-making systems affect girls' education, focusing on accountability gaps and responsibility challenges in secondary schools. The study discussed AI’s role in perpetuating biases and reinforcing stereotypes, and it also proposed solutions to address these issues. Key concerns, such as accountability and responsibility, are identified, and frameworks for the responsible deployment of AI are proposed. The study emphasises collaboration among education stakeholders to address issues raised and promote equitable education, and offers policy decisions to bridge accountability gaps in AI usage. Recommendations such as providing teachers with AI literacy training to recognise biases affecting the girl child in AI-driven decision-making, paying attention to gender parity, and adopting transparent AI, among others.

KeyWords:

Rethinking, Human Responsibility, Rethinking Human Responsibility, Accountability, AI-Driven Decision-Making, Girl Child Education

References:

  1. Adewale, M. D., Azeta, A., Abayomi-Alli, A., & Sambo-Magaji, A. (2024). Impact of artificial intelligence adoption on students’ academic performance in open and distance learning: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 10(22), e40025. https://doi.org/10 .1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40025
  2. African Centre for Leadership, Strategy & Development. (2025). Girl-child education in Nigeria: Challenges and prospects. Centre LSD.
  3. Ahmad, S., Han, H., Alam, M., Rehmat, M., Irshad, M., Arraño-Muñoz, M., & Ariza-Montes, A. (2023). Impact of artificial intelligence on human loss in decision making, laziness and safety in education. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 10. 311. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01787-8
  4. Albahli, S. (2025). Advancing sustainable educational practices through AI-driven prediction of academic outcomes. Sustainability, 17(3), 1087. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031087
  5. Al-Dulaimi, A., & Mohammed, F. (2025). AI accountability frameworks: Bridging the responsibility gap in autonomous systems. International Journal of AI Governance, 4(1), 35–50.
  6. Alsbou, M., & Alsaraireh, R. (2024). Data-driven decision-making in education: Leveraging AI for school improvement. 2024 International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Communication Systems (ICKECS), 1, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ ickecs61492.2024.10616616
  7. Akporehe, D. A., & Uviovo, M. A. (2023). Innovation for attaining sustainable development goals: Persisting in schools in Nigeria. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 11(4) 238-250
  8. Atwa, A., & Khan, A. H.  (2025). A comparative analysis on artificial intelligence in the modern education system: A general perspective among gender and locality of academic fraternity belongs to Sonipat District, Haryana, India. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Trends, 7(7)  95-100. 
  9. Boateng, O., & Boateng, B. (2025). Algorithmic bias in educational systems: Examining the I, Impact of AI-driven decision making in modern education. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews25(01), 2012-2017 https://doi.org/10.30574/ wjarr.2025.25.1.0253
  10. Bulathwela, S., Pérez-Ortiz, M., Holloway, C., Cukurova, M., & Shawe-Taylor, J. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Alone Will Not Democratise Education: On Educational Inequality, Techno-Solutionism and Inclusive Tools. Sustainability16(2), 781. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020781
  11. Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender Shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 81, 77–91. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a.html
  12. Cath, C., Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the “good society”: The US, EU, and UK approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(2), 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9901-7
  13. Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2988510
  14. Díaz Rodríguez, N., Redrup Hill, C., & Naik, A. (2023). Accountability and human oversight in AI systems. Journal of Ethics in Artificial Intelligence, 5(1), 45–60.
  15. Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv.1702.08608.
  16. European Commission. (2025). AI Act | Shaping Europe’s digital futurehttps://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/ regulatory-framework-ai
  17. García-Ull, F., & Melero-Lázaro, M.  (2023). Gender stereotypes in AI-generated images. Profesional de la información, 32(5), 1-12 e320505. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.sep.05.
  18. Holstein, K., Wortman Vaughan, J., Daumé III, H., Dudik, M., & Wallach, H. (2019). Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need? Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16.
  19. IICBA, UNESCO. (2022). Education country brief: Nigeria. UNESCO International Institute for Capacity Building in Africa. https://iicba.unesco.org/
  20. Imran, A., Li, J., & Alshammari, A. (2025). AI-driven educational transformation in ICT: Improving adaptability, sentiment, and academic performance with advanced machine learning. PLOS One,  20(5), e0317519. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.03 17519
  21. International Institute for Capacity Building in Africa (IICBA), UNESCO. (2022). Education country brief: Nigeria. UNESCO.
  22. Lai, T., Xie, C., Ruan, M., Wang, Z., Lu, H., & Fu, S. (2023). Influence of artificial intelligence in education on adolescents’ social adaptability: The mediatory role of social support. PLOS ONE, 18(3), e0283170. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0283170
  23. Lepri, B., Oliver, N., Letouzé, E., Pentland, A., & Vinck, P. (2021). Fair, transparent, and accountable algorithmic decision-making processes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 379(2193), 20200262.
  24. Lin, C., Huang, A., & Lu, O. (2023). Artificial intelligence in intelligent tutoring systems toward sustainable education: a systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00260-y
  25. Naik, A., Redrup Hill, C., & Díaz Rodríguez, N. (2022). Ethical governance of AI in education: Challenges and opportunities. AI & Society, 37, 1121–1135.
  26. Ogheneakoke, C. E., Benike, J., & Obro, S. (2018). Internet access and usage:  impact on students’ academic performance in Social Studies. European Journal of Education Studies, 5(1), 56-75.
  27. ProPublica. (2016). Machine bias: There is software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing
  28. Raji, I. D., Smart, A., White, R. N., Mitchell, M., Gebru, T., Hutchinson, B., & Barnes, P. (2020). Closing the AI accountability gap: Defining an end-to-end framework for internal algorithmic auditing. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 33–44.
  29. Redrup Hill, C., Díaz Rodríguez, N., & Naik, A. (2023). Moral responsibility in autonomous AI systems. Ethics in AI Journal, 6(2), 78–95.
  30. Santoni de Sio, F., & Mecacci, G. (2021). Ethics of artificial intelligence: Human responsibility and the moral gap. AI & Ethics, 1(2), 129–137.
  31. Sharma, P. (2024). Artificial intelligence as a catalyst for gender equality: Empowering women across healthcare, education, and entrepreneurship. Mind and Society,  13(03), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.56011/mind-mri-133-20245
  32. Ngonso, B. F., Egielewa, P. E., Egenti, G., et al. (2025). Influence of artificial intelligence on the educational performance of Nigerian students in tertiary institutions in Nigeria. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 9(1), 9949. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd9949
  33. Tatipamula, S. (2025). Regulatory frameworks for AI governance: Ensuring accountability in automated systems. Journal of Technology and Law, 12(1), 1–23.
  34. The Guardian / LSE study reporting. (2025). AI tools used by English councils downplay women's health issues, study finds. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/aug/11/ai-tools-used-by-english-councils-downplay-womens-health-issues-study-finds
  35. ThisDayLive. (2025). Challenges facing girl-child education in Nigeria. Retrieved from https://www.thisdaylive.com
  36. UNESCO (2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/recommen dation-ethics-artificial-intelligence
  37. UNESCO. (2025). Closing the digital divide for women and girls in Africa through education. https://www.unesco.org/en/gender -equality/education/digital-divide
  38. Uwaifo, R. O., Osah, M. I., & Obro, S. (2025). Computer-aided instruction on social studies students’ achievement and retention outcome. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 19(3), 1533 -1540
  39. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
  40. Varsha P.S.(2023). How can we manage biases in artificial intelligence systems – A systematic literature review. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 3(1), 100165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100165
  41. Wang, Y. (2020). When artificial intelligence meets educational leaders’ data-informed decision-making: A cautionary tale. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 62, 100872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100872
  42. World Bank. (2025). Analyzing the gender digital skills divide in sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank working paper. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/
  43. Xia, Q., Chiu, T., Lee, M., Sanusi, I., Dai, Y., & Chai, C. (2022). A self-determination theory (SDT) design approach for inclusive and diverse artificial intelligence (AI) education. Computers & Education, 189, 104582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu. 2022.104582
  44. Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students' cognitive abilities: a systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
  45. White Rose University Consortium ( 2024). Gender perceptions of generative ai in higher education. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education  1-36.      ISSN 2050-7003