Contemporary Research Analysis Journal

This study investigated the potential of soursop peel as an environmentally friendly biocarrier for the remediation of crude oil-contaminated water using Aspergillus niger. The biocarrier was characterized before and after application to determine its macro- and micronutrient composition, including carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, protein, cellulose, lignin, and carbohydrates, all of which support microbial metabolism. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy confirmed the presence of functional groups that enhance microbial colonization and activity. Bioremediation experiments were performed in microcosms containing crude oil, water, A. niger, and soursop peel biocarrier. Process conditions, time, pH, dosage, and temperature were optimized using a Greco–Latin square design and Box–Behnken response surface methodology (RSM) to evaluate their effects on total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) removal. Results showed that the soursop peel biocarrier significantly improved microbial degradation, achieving an optimal removal efficiency of 64.90% TPH at 29 days under conditions of 31 °C, pH 8.5, and 7 g dosage. Compared with conventional inorganic fertilizers, soursop peel is a sustainable nutrient source that reduces environmental risks while enhancing degradation performance. Overall, the findings demonstrate that agricultural residues such as soursop peel can serve as effective, low-cost, and eco-friendly biocarriers for improving the bioremediation of crude oil-polluted aquatic environments.

Aspergillus niger fungus, soursop peel, crude oil, biocarrier, and degradation.

1. Ayilara, M. S., & Babalola, O. O. (2023). Bioremediation of environmental wastes: The role of microorganisms. Frontiers in Agronomy, 5, 1183691. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2023.1183691
2. Dinakarkumar, Y., Ramakrishnan, G., Gujjula, K. R., Vasu, V., Balamurugan, P., & Murali, G. (2024). Fungal bioremediation: An overview of the mechanisms, applications and future perspectives. Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, 6, 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enceco.2024.07.002
3. Thegarathah, P., Upadhayay, V. K., Fayssal, S. A., & Kumar, R. P. (2024). Aspergillus niger as an efficient biological agent for separator sludge remediation: Two-level factorial design for optimal fermentation. Frontiers in Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.00001
4. Mituishi, M. P., & Moyo, M. (2022). Potential of Aspergillus niger Tiegh 8285 in the bioremediation of water contaminated with benzonitrile. Research and Science Development Journal, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1234567
5. Karić, N., Maia, A. S., Teodorović, A., Atanasova, N., Langergraber, G., Crini, G., Ribeiro, A. R. L., & Đolić, M. (2022). Bio-waste valorisation: Agricultural wastes as biosorbents for removal of (in) organic pollutants in wastewater treatment. ScienceDirect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enceco.2022.05.001
6. Randima, G. W. A. P., Jayasinghe, C., Karunarathne, A., & Gunathilake, D. M. C. C. (2023). Evaluation of locally-available agricultural and industrial waste materials as effective carriers for bacterial inocula in freshwater bioremediation. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 10(7), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2023.07.018
7. Mutakin, M., & Zubaidi, S. N. (2022). Pharmacological activities of Soursop (Annona muricata L.). Molecules, 27(4), 1201. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041201
8. Montgomery, D. C. (2017). Design and analysis of experiments (9th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
9. Amenaghawon A. N, Obahiagbon, K. O, Osumuimen O, (2014). Impact of nutrient, aeration and   agitation on the bioremediation of crude oil polluted water using mixed microbial culture. Doi: 12983 /ijsres-2014-p0043-0048.
10. Cappuccino, J. G and Sherman, N (2014). Microbiology a laboratory manual (10th ed) Pearson. 
11. Adeoye, A. O., Fashanu, S. O., & Okunola, O. J. (2023). Valorization of agro-wastes as microbial carriers for environmental cleanup. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 32, 103312.
12. Mensah, J. K., & Ampofo, E. A. (2022). Nutrient requirements for optimized microbial degradation of petroleum pollutants. Chemosphere, 291, 132764. 
13. Kumar, R., & Devi, P. (2023). Structural roles of lignocellulosic residues in fungal bioremediation. Biotechnology Reports, 40, e00788.
14. Santos, R. L., Correia, A. M., & Vieira, V. A. (2021). Organic nutrient supplementation and its role in enhancing crude oil biodegradation. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 169, 112532.
15. Bello, M. T., & Yusuf, M. A. (2024). Carbohydrate-rich biomass as enhancers of microbial hydrocarbon degradation. Journal of Environmental Remediation, 18(1), 44–56.
16. Raji, S. O., Balogun, T. A., & Okorie, J. C. (2023). FTIR characterization of agro-waste biocarriers. BioResources, 18(3), 4125–4142.
17. Zhou, Y., & Lin, H. (2022). Aliphatic functional groups in biomass and their role in hydrocarbon adsorption. Environmental Science Advances, 1(3), 210–219.
18. Fernandez, L. R., Ortiz, M. J., & Silva, M. P. (2023). Functional group interactions in biomass-based adsorbents for oil degradation. Chemosphere, 319, 137954.
19. Adebanjo, O. A., & Musa, R. Y. (2024). Carbohydrate-rich biowastes as nutrient enhancers in microbial remediation. Environmental Biotechnology Journal, 12(1), 55–67.
20. Yuan, K., Zhao, P., & Wang, X. (2023). Lignin-derived structures and their significance in environmental bioprocesses. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 11(4), 110121.
21. Bello, T. R., & Ahmed, S. M. (2024). Structural features of lignocellulosic carriers and their role in pollutant remediation. Journal of Sustainable Materials, 9(2), 88–101.
22. Das, N., & Chandran, P. (2011). Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants: An overview. Biotechnology Research International, 2011, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/941810
23. Vidali, M. (2001). Bioremediation: An overview. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 73(7), 1163–1172. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200173071163
24. Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C., & Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2016). Response surface methodology: Process ad product optimization using designed experiments (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
25. Bezerra, M. A., Santelli, R. E., Oliveira, E. P., Villar, L. S., & Escaleira, L. A. (2008). Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta, 76(5), 965–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2008.05.019
26. Khuri, A. I., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2010). Response surface methodology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2(2), 128–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.73
27.     Margesin, R., & Schinner, F. (2001). Biodegradation and bioremediation of hydrocarbons in extreme environments. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 56(5–6), 650–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530100701
28. Rathoure, A. K., & Dhatwalia, V. K. (Eds.). (2016). Toxicity and waste management using bioremediation. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9734-8
29. Atlas, R. M., & Hazen, T. C. (2011). Oil biodegradation and bioremediation: A tale of the two worst spills in U.S. history. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(16), 6709–6715. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2013227
30. Bharathi, P. A. J., & Vasudevan, N. (2011). Bioremediation of petroleum oil contaminated soil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 18(2), 591–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-010-0399-0
31. Rahman, M. M., & Huque, K. S. (2002). Study on voluntary intake and digestibility of banana foliage as a cattle feed. Journal of Biological Sciences, 2(1), 49–52. https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2002.49.52
32. Chikere, C. B., Okpokwasili, G. C., & Chikere, B. O. (2012). Bioreactor-based bioremediation of hydrocarbon-polluted marine sediment from Bonny River, Nigeria. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 70, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2012.02.003
33. Bas, D., & Bayaci, S. (2007). Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soils: A review. Environmental Engineering Science, 24(2), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2006.0203