Contemporary Research Analysis Journal

This study provides the first comprehensive empirical analysis of the digital gender gap (DGG) and its economic consequences across the ten member states of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN-10) over 20102024. Because conventional System GMM is inadmissible at N=10, we deploy Cross-Sectionally Augmented ARDL (CS-ARDL) as our primary estimator, with Pooled Mean Group, Mean Group, and fixed-effects with Driscoll-Kraay standard errors as robustness checks. To capture cross-border externalities, we estimate Spatial Durbin Models with five alternative weighting matrices. A one-percentage-point reduction in the composite DGG index is associated with a long-run 0.81% rise in real GDP per capita, a 0.19 percentage-point rise in female labour force participation, and a 0.06 point decline in the Gini coefficient. Spatial decomposition attributes 32-38% of total effects to cross-border spillovers, and Hansen threshold tests identify a critical broadband penetration of 9.4 subscriptions per 100 inhabitants above which DGG effects intensify. Findings call for embedding genderdisaggregated targets in the successor to the ASEAN Digital Masterplan 2025, leveraging the Digital Economy Framework Agreement to harmonize affordability provisions, and prioritizing infrastructure expansion in Cambodia, Lao PDR, and Myanmar. 

Digital gender gap; ASEAN; CS-ARDL; Spatial Durbin Model; female labour force participation; income inequality; spillovers.

1. Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2011). Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. In Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 4, pp. 1043-1171): Elsevier. 
2. Antonio, A., & Tuffley, D. (2014). The gender digital divide in developing countries. Future Internet, 6(4), 673687. 
3. Asongu, S., & Odhiambo, N. M. (2024). Enhancing ICT for female economic participation in sub-Saharan Africa. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 15(2), 195-223. 
4. Becker, G. S. (2002). Human capital. The concise encyclopedia of economics, 2, 1-12. 
5. Blomquist, J., & Westerlund, J. (2013). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels with serial correlation. Economics Letters, 121(3), 374-378. 
6. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of econometrics, 87(1), 115-143. 
7. Cameron, A. C., Gelbach, J. B., & Miller, D. L. (2008). Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors. The review of economics and statistics, 90(3), 414-427. 
8. Driscoll, J. C., & Kraay, A. C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of economics and statistics, 80(4), 549-560. 
9. Hansen, B. E. (1999). Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference. Journal of econometrics, 93(2), 345-368. 
10. Hargittai, E. (2001). Second-level digital divide: Mapping differences in people's online skills. arXiv preprint cs/0109068. 
11. Jordà, Ò. (2005). Estimation and inference of impulse responses by local projections. American economic review, 95(1), 161-182. 
12. Lee, L.-f., & Yu, J. (2010). Estimation of spatial autoregressive panel data models with fixed effects. Journal of econometrics, 154(2), 165-185. 
13. LeSage, J., & Pace, R. K. (2009). Introduction to spatial econometrics: Chapman and Hall/CRC. 
14. MacKinnon, J. G., & Webb, M. D. (2018). The wild bootstrap for few (treated) clusters. The Econometrics Journal, 21(2), 114-135. 
15. Mariscal, J., Mayne, G., Aneja, U., & Sorgner, A. (2019). Bridging the gender digital gap. Economics: The OpenAccess, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 13(2019-9), 1-12. 
16. Peláez‐Sánchez, I. C., George Reyes, C. E., & Glasserman‐Morales, L. D. (2023). Gender digital divide in education 4.0: A systematic literature review of factors and strategies for inclusion. Future in educational research, 1(2), 129-146. 
17. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American statistical Association, 94(446), 621-634. 
18. Ragnedda, M. (2018). Conceptualizing digital capital. Telematics and informatics, 35(8), 2366-2375. 
19. Roodman, D. (2009). A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 71(1), 135-158. 
20. Shuangshuang, Y., Zhu, W., Mughal, N., Aparcana, S. I. V., & Muda, I. (2023). The impact of education and digitalization on female labour force participation in BRICS: an advanced panel data analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 598. 
21. Ticona, J., & Mateescu, A. (2018). Trusted strangers: Carework platforms’ cultural entrepreneurship in the ondemand economy. New media & society, 20(11), 4384-4404. 
22. Tunçsiper, Ç. (2025). Bridging the digital divide with gender equity in the digital world: empirical insights from OECD countries. Journal of Work-Applied Management.  van Deursen, A. J., & Helsper, E. J. (2015). The Third-Level Digital Divide: Who Benefits Most from Being Online? Communication and Information Technologies Annual, 29-52. 
23. Van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide: John Wiley & Sons. 
24. Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 69(6), 709-748. 
25. Xu, J., Qiu, Y., Rahman, M. K., Bhuiyan, M. A., & Hasan, T. (2025). The regional economic spatial spillover effect of China and ASEAN. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 25(1), 8.