Contemporary Research Analysis Journal

The purpose of this study was to establish the mediating role of competitive advantage in the relationship between institutional quality and the performance of manufacturing Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Uganda. We used a quantitative cross-sectional survey design and data were collected from 274 owners and managers of manufacturing SMEs using a self-administered questionnaire. We employed proportionate stratified and simple random sampling techniques to select final respondents following their homogeneity in the nature of businesses. Data were analysed using SPSS and smart-PLS to establish the direct and indirect relationships between study variables. The findings show that there is no significant relationship between institutional quality and performance of manufacturing SMEs. However, competitive advantage fully mediates the relationship between the study variables. This implies that institution quality can only foster improved performance of manufacturing SMEs if it unlocks the competitive advantage of businesses that acts as a conduit for better performance.

Institutional Quality, Performance, Competitive advantage

1. Abaho, E., Aarakit, S. M., Ntayi, J. M., & Kisubi, M. (2016). Firm capabilities, Entrepreneurial Competency and Performance Firm Capabilities, Entrepreneurial Competency and Performance of Ugandan. Business Management Review, July 2017, 22.
2. Abedin, S. H., Haque, H., Shahjahan, T., & Kabir, M. N. (2022). Institutional Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from an Emerging Economy. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(12), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15120567
3. Alinda, K., Tumwine, S., Kaawaase, T. K., Sserwanga, A., & Nalukenge, I. (2023). Intellectual capital and sustainability practices of manufacturing firms in Uganda. IIMBG Journal of Sustainable Business and Innovation, 1(1), 18–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSBI-03-2023-0016.
4. Amin, E. (2005). Social science research. Kampala, Uganda: Makerere University Printery.
5. Asenahabi, B. M. (2019). Basics of research design: A guide to selecting appropriate research design. International Journal of Contemporary Applied Researches, 6(5), 76-89. 
6. Audretsch, D. B., Id, M. B., and  Id, N. C. (2021), “Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities : the role of institutions”, PLoS ONE, 16(3), 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247609
7. Bakashaba, R., Musiita, B., & Nabachwa, S. (2024). Entrepreneurial Networking and Performance of Ugandan Manufacturing SMEs: The Mediating Role of Innovation Capabilities *Rennie. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 16(2), 87–98.
8. Balzano, M., Marzi, G., & Turzo, T. (2025). SMEs and institutional theory : major inroads and opportunities ahead. Management Decision, 63(13), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2023-0734.
9. Banalieva, E. R., Cuervo-cazurra, A., & Sarathy, R. (2018). Dynamics of pro-market institutions and firm performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(7), 41. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0155-7.
10. Banalieva, E., Eddleston, K., & Zellweger, R. 2015. When do family firms have an advantage in transitioning economies? Toward a dynamic institution-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 36(9): 1358-1377.
11. Biru, A., Gilbert, D. and Arenius, P. (2023), “Entrepreneurship & Regional Development Unhelpful help: the state of support programmes and the dynamics of entrepreneurship ecosystems in Ethiopia”, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 00(00), 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2020.1734267.
12. Birungi, H., Mbidde, C. I., & Mutunzi, A. K. (2024). Entrepreneurial ecosystem pillars and performance of  SMEs in the manufacturing sector of Uganda. Journal of Ethics in Entrepreneurship and Technology Received26, 29. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEET-06-2024-0017.
13. Bykova, A., & Coates, D. (2020). Firm performance and regional economic freedom: The case of Russia. Post-soviet Affairs, 36(5–6), 395–415
14. Calabrese, L., Golooba-Mutebi, F. and Mendez-Parra, M. (2019), “Industrial development in Uganda” An assessment of the policy framework, (Issue December).
15. Carney, M., Estrin, S., Liang, Z., & Shapiro, D. (2019). National institutional systems, foreign ownership and firm performance: The case of understudied countries. Journal of World Business, 54(4), 244–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2018.03.003.
16. Chang, C. (2023). The impact of quality of institutions on firm performance : A global analysis. International Review of Economics and Finance, 83(June 2021), 694–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.10.002.
17. Chari, M., & Banalieva, E. 2015. How do pro-market reforms impact firm profitability? The case of India under reform. Journal of World Business, 50(2): 357-367.
18. Chew, T. C., Bose, T. K., & Fan, Y. (2021). Country Institutional Environments in Promoting Entrepreneurship : Assessment Based on Developing Economies in Asia Country Institutional Environments in Promoting Entrepreneurship : Assessment Based on Developing Economies in Asia. Journal of East-West Business, 0(https://doi.org/10.1080/10669868.2021.1921895), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10669868.2021.1921895
19. Cohen, M. A. and Kunreuther, H. (2007), “Operations risk managemen Overview of Paul Kleindorfer’s contributions” Production and Operations Management, 16(5), 525–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2007. tb00278.x
20. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Table of Contents (Fifth Edit). SAGE Publications Inc.
21. Dewi, I. C. (2023), “Examining the Influence of CEO Characteristics and Brand Image on Performance of Food and Beverages M SMEs in Indonesia : the Mediating Role of Competitive Advantage” International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 4(2), 1030–1051.
22. Dinh, C. K., & Ngo, Q. T. (2021). The impact of institutional pressures and top management regulations on firm performance. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 23(2), 90–105. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2021.23.2.06
23. Duran, P., van Essen, M., Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., Kostova, T. and Peng, M. W. (2019), “The impact of institutions on the competitive advantage of publicly listed family firms in emerging markets”, Global Strategy Journal, 9(2), 243–274, https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1312.
24. Eldomiaty, T. I., Apaydin, M., El-sehwagy, A., Ibrahim, T., Apaydin, M., & El-sehwagy, A. (2023). Institutional quality and firm-level financial performance : implications from G8 and MENA Countries Institutional quality and firm-level financial performance : implications from G8 and MENA Countries. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2220249
25. Erastus, Y. E., & Stephen, A. (2014). Institutional quality for Promoting Small and Medium Scale Enterprises in Ghana : Perspective of Entrepreneurs. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 3(10), 28–45.
26. Escandon-barbosa, D. and Salas-Paramo, J. (2023), “Asia Paci fi c Management Review The role of informal institutions in the relationship between innovation and organisational learning in export performance: a bidirectional relation ?”, Asia Pacific Management Review, 28(185–193), 9.,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2022.08.001
27. Gathungu, J. and Bitange, N. (2021), “The relationship between Competitive Strategy Drivers and Performance of manufacturing SMEs in The relationship between Competitive Strategy Drivers and Performance of manufacturing SMEs in Nairobi County”, European Scientific Journal, 17(January), 27. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2021.v17n1p102
28. Goobi, R., Wabukala, B. M. and Ntayi, J. (2017), “Economic Development and Industrial Policy in Uganda”, In Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Kampala, Uganda, 15,3, https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-6228(95)90025-x
29. Guliev, R., & Mehari, A. (2023). Why Competitiveness of Light Manufacturing Industries Matters to East African Countries. In the Case of Ethiopia, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda 3 Definition of Competitiveness. WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on BUSINESS and ECONOMICS, 20, 601–610. https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2023.20.55.
30. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Gudergan, S. P., Fischer, A., Nitzl, C., & Menictas, C. (2019). Partial least squares structural equation modeling-based discrete choice modeling: an illustration in modeling retailer choice. Business Research, 12(1), 115–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-018-0072-4
31. Insee, K. and Suttipun, M. (2023), Research and Development spending, competitive advantage, and firm performance in Thailand”, Cogent Business & Management, 10(2), 2225831.
32. Javid, N. J. and Amini, M. (2023), “Evaluating the effect of supply chain management practice on implementation of halal agroindustry and competitive advantage for SMEs”,International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 15(6).
33. Kafouros, M., & Aliyev, M. (2016). Institutional development and firm profitability in transition economies. Journal ofWorld Business, 51(3), 369–378.
34. Kafouros, M., Chandrashekar, S. P., Aliyev, M. and Au, A. K. M. (2022), “How do formal and informal institutions influence firm profitability in emerging countries?”, [University Of Leeds]. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2021.100890.
35. Kafouros, M. (2023). The role of institutional quality and industry dynamism in explaining firm performance in emerging economies. Global Strategy Journal Published, October 2021, 56–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1479
36. Kakooza, J., & Nabwami, R. (2023). Business choice, location decision and success of SMEs in Uganda. Journal of Money and Business, 3(1), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMB-08-2022-0041.
37. Kiyabo, K. and Isaga, N. (2020), “Entrepreneurial orientation, competitive advantage, and SMEs’ performance: application of firm growth and personal wealth measures”, Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 9(1), 12.
38. Kock, F. (2021). Understanding and Managing the Threat of Common Method Bias; Detection, Prevention and Control. Tourism Management ·, November. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104330
39. Kouassi, Y. (2024), “Manufacturing”, Published online at futures.issafrica.org. Retrieved from
40. [Online Resource] Updated 04 June 2024.https://futures.issafrica.org/thematic/07-manufacturing.
41. Kurtulmuş, B. E., Katrinli, A., & Warner, B. (2020). International Entrepreneurial Orientation and Performance of SMEs : The Mediating Role of Informal Institutional quality. Sage, 1(9), 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020983294
42. Marlon, J.R. (2019), “How Hope and Doubt Affect Climate Change Mobilization”, Front. Commun., 4, 20 pp., doi:10.3389/fcomm.2019.00020.
43. Meilanda, P., Syalwa, M., & Adhillah, M. N. (2025). Institutional Ownership on Firm Performance : a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Finance and Business Digital, 4(1), 157–172.
44. Miles, M. P. (2024). Impact of government support policies on entrepreneurial orientation and Performance of manufacturing SMEs. In International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal (Vol. 20, Issue 3). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-024-00993-3
45. Ministry of Industry, Trade and Commerce. MTIC. (2015), “Uganda Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise (MSME) Policy”. 
46. Mondolo, J. (2019), “How do informal institutions influence inward FDI? A systematic review”, Economia politica, 36(1), 167-204.
47. Moyo, C., & Jeke, L. (2019). Manufacturing Sector and Economic Growth: A Panel Study of Selected African Countries. GATR Journal of Business and Economics Review, 4(3), 114–130. https://doi.org/10.35609/jber.2019.4.3(1)
48. National Planning Authority, N. P. A (2020), “Third national development plan” (ndpiii) 2020/21 – 2024/25 (Issue June 2020).
49. North DC (1990), “Institutions and their consequences for economic performance”, In Schweers Cook K, Levi M (eds) The limits of rationality. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 383–401
50. Novitasari, M. and Agustina, D. (2022), “Assessing the Impact of Green Supply Chain Management, Competitive Advantage and Firm Performance in PROPER Companies in Indonesia”, Operations and Supply Chain Management, 15(3), 395-406.
51. Nuwagaba, G., Nyende, F., & Namanya, D. (2021). Financing Options and Sustainable Small Business Growth in Uganda; An Optimal Model. International Business Research, 14(10), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v14n10p85.
52. Oliveira, A., Carvalho, F., & Reis, N. R. (2025). Institutional experience, formal institutional quality, and firm performance : An analysis of firms from the European Union. Spanish Academy of Management, 28(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444241301067
53. Pereira, R., & Moré, O. (2016). Institutional Theory of Strategic Capacity and Competitive Advantage : Theoretical View of the Information Technology Industry in Brazil. 7(3), 671–679.
54. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y. and Podsakoff, N. P. (2003), “Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies”, Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879.
55. Podsakoff, P. M., Podsakoff, N. P., Williams, L. J., Huang, C., & Yang, J. (2024). Common Method Bias : It ’ s Bad , It ’ s Complex , It ’ s Widespread , and It ’ s Not Easy to Fix. Annual Review OfOrganizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 17–61. https://doi.org/110721- 040030.
56. Porter, M. E. (1985), “Clusters and the new economics of competition”, Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90 
57. Ricardianto, P., Toding, A., Tatiana, Y., Ruminda, M. and Ibnu, A. (2023), “Enterprise risk management and business strategy on firm performance: the role of mediating competitive advantage”, Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 11, 249–260. http://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2022.10.002
58. Sahasranamam, S. and Nandakumar, M. K. (2020), “Individual capital and social entrepreneurship: Role of formal institutions”, Journal of Business Research, 107, 104-117.
59. Saputra, K. A. K., Subroto, B., Rahman, A. F. and Saraswati, E. (2023), “Mediation Role of Environmental Management Accounting on the Effect of Green Competitive Advantage on Sustainable Performance”, Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 18(2), 103–115. http://doi.org/10.46754/jssm.2023.02.008
60. Saunders, M. N., Philip lewis, & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research Methods for Business Students (Ninth Edit). Pearson Education Limited.
61. Setyawati, M., Rosiana, M., & Shariff, M. (2017). Competitive Advantage as Mediating Variable on the Relationship between Innovation and Business Performance on SMES in Purwokerto Province.
62. Sendawula, K., Kisubi, M. K., Najjinda, S., Nantale, H. and Kabbera, S. (2023), “The efficacy of entrepreneurial networking and innovation in fostering the performance of small businesses in Uganda”, Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 88.
63. Sserunjogi, B., Corti Paul, L., Nathan, S. and Rehema, K. (2021), “The Uganda Business Climate Index sector performance”, Economic Policy Research Centre, 33, 4.
64. Sserwanja, R., Alex, I., Kazaara, A. I., & Nancy, M. (2024). Waste as Business; Firm Capabilities, Innovations and Growth Of Firms In The Sanitation Sub-Sector. 8(6), 192–204.
65. UBOS. (2023),  “Uganda bureau of statistics 202 statistical abstract”.
66. Urbano, D., Aparicio, S. and Audretsch, D. (2019), “Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned?”, Small business economics, 53, 21-49.
67. World Economic Forum. (2013), “Entrepreneurial ecosystems around the globe and company growth dynamics”, Davos, World Economic Forum.
68. Yaskun, M., Hermawan, A., & Rahayu, W. P. (2023). The effect of market orientation, entrepreneurial orientation, innovation and competitive advantage on business performance M SMEs Bus. International Journal of Proffessional Business Review, 8(4), 1–21.