Contemporary Research Analysis Journal

This article explores personalization of learning as a strategy to help students who are failing, based on their individual preferences. By identifying learning styles (visual, auditory, kinesthetic), it highlights the importance of an adapted approach to meet the specific needs of each student. A personalized learning model is presented, emphasizing flexibility, engagement, and the use of technology to support learning. The article suggests concrete strategies, personalized tutoring and the formation of adapted learning groups. It also presents a case study that illustrates the effectiveness of these approaches. Finally, it emphasizes the importance of continuous assessment and feedback to adjust pedagogical approaches, the importance of regularly assessing student progress and collecting feedback to adjust methods, thus encouraging educators to adopt more personalized practices in order to promote the academic success of students in difficulty

Personalization, Strategy, Failure, Learning Styles, Approach.

1. Audebert, P. (2014). Construction of professional identities among young school teachers from immigrant backgrounds: the role of interpersonal relationships in the family and school contexts (Doctoral thesis, Conservatoire national des arts et métiers-CNAM).
2. Başkan, N. S. (2023). Implementation of distance learning on moodle: study of a grammar course for future French teachers (PhD thesis, Marmara Universitesi (Turkey)).
3. Blaya, C. (2010). School dropouts: schools in difficulty. Brussels: De Boeck.
4. Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for group teaching methods as effective as individual tutoring*. Educational researcher, 13(6), 4-16.
5. Chamberland, C., & McAndrew, M. (2011). The Academic Success of Students with an Immigrating Background in Quebec: Ministerial Commitment and Recent Research Results. Canadian Issues/Thèmes canadiens, 9-14.
6. Connac, S., Hueber, C., & Lanneau, L. (2022). Flexible accommodations and cooperation between students. Didactics, 3(1), 11-36.
7. Debarbieux, É. (2015). The "school climate". Education & Training, 88(01), p-11.
8. Dunn, R. and Dunn, K. (1993). Teaching students through their individual learning styles: a practical approach. Allyn and Bacon.
9. El Messaoudi, N., El Khomri, M., El Mouden, A., Bouich, A., Jada, A., Lacherai, A., ... and Américo-Pinheiro, J. H. P. (2024). Regeneration and reuse of low-cost non-conventional adsorbents to remove dyes from wastewater in consecutive adsorption-desorption cycles: a review. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 14(11), 11739-11756.
10. Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681.
11. Fleming, N. D. and Mills, C. (1992). Not another inventory, but rather a catalyst for change. To improve the academy, 11(1), 137-148.
12. Gagné, R. M. and Parks, S. (2013). Learning conditions: Training applications. Educational technology publications. 
13. Galand, B. and Vanlede, M. (2004). Sense of self-efficacy in learning and training: what role does it play? Where does it come from? How to intervene? Savoirs, (5), 91-116.
14. Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: theory in practice. Basic books.
15. Janosz, M., Le Blanc, M., Boulerice, B., & Tremblay, R. E. (2000). Prediction of the different types of school dropout: a typological approach with two longitudinal samples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 171.
16. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). A Success in Educational Psychology: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 91-105.
17. Khan Academy. (2022). About Khan Academy. https://www.khanacademy.org
18. Kwiek, M., & Roszka, W. (2024). Do scientists change their research productivity classes as they move up the academic ladder?. Innovative Higher Education, 1-39.
19. Larose, S., & Roy, R. (1993). The Problematic Integration into College Studies Program, Screening, Intervention and Evaluation: Research Report.
20. Levine, A. (2011). Former school heads. The project of schools of education.
21. Mingat, A., & Ogier, C. (1994). Elements for a new reflection on primary schools in rural areas. Knowledge, Education, Training, 6(1), 111-125
22. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
23. Ndagijimana, J. B. (2013). THE FACTORS OF LOW MOTIVATION AND THEIR EFFECTS ON LEARNING. Case of students at the Ecole Normale Primaire (ENP/TTC) in Rwanda (Doctoral thesis, University of Bouaké; University of Bouaké/Côte d'Ivoire).
24. Rivière, C. (1996). For a theory of the ritualized everyday: and presentation of contributions. French Ethnology, 26(2), 229-238.
25. UNESCO. (2020). Global Education Monitoring Report 2020: Inclusion and education: everything means everything. Paris: UNESCO.
26. Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The Differentiated Classroom: Meeting the Needs of All Learners (2nd ed.). The ASCD