Functional and Mucoadhesive Properties of Native and Modified Eucalyptus Tereticornis Gum in Oral Chlorpheniramine Maleate Tablets
Abstract:
As excipients, mucoadhesive polymers increase the resident times of drugs in the mucin/epithelial surface, which is significant for drugs with short half-lives. Native (ETG) and acetylated Eucalyptus tereticornis gum (AETG) were incorporated as excipients in directly compressed uncoated and matrix chlorpheniramine maleate tablets, and evaluated for their physicochemical, compressional, release functionalities and mucoadhesive properties. The gums were characterized using photo micrography, rheology, density and compression measurements, swelling capacity (27±0.50C and 80±0.50C) and FTIR spectroscopy as criteria, and incorporated as excipients (2.5-10.0%w/w) in chlorpheniramine maleate tablets for their compression and release properties, while the mucoadhesive properties of tablet matrix (10-80% w/w gum) were evaluated using pig and cow ilea in 0.1MHCL (pH 1.2). ETG and AETG were spherical to angular in shape. AETGhad higher breakdown (907±0.02cP), peak (930±0.01cP) and final (24±1.06cP) viscosities, but lower set back viscosity (3.50±0.03cP), with higher angle of repose, bulk and tapped desities, but lower Carr’s index and Hausner’s ratio. The ETG had lower deformation characteristics as evidenced by the higher Pk values and lower swelling capacities at both temperatures. FTIR spectra indicated significant presence of more functional groups at 757.13cm-1 and 427.66cm-1 in AETG due to strong aromatic N-H bond and C-S stretching of aliphatic halogenated compounds. Formulations containing AETG disintegrated and dissolved faster and showed better mucoadhesive profiles in pig ileum. Acetylation of Eucalyptus tereticornis gum exhibited better functional properties and generally showed better compressional, release and mucoadhesive properties when compared to the unmodified gum.
KeyWords:
Chemical modification, Direct compression, Mucoadhesion, Eucalyptus tereticornis gum
References:
- Abruzzo, A.; Cerchiara, T.; Bigucci, F.; Gallucci, M.C.; Luppi, B.(2015) Mucoadhesive Buccal Tablets Based on Chitosan/Gelatin Microparticles for Delivery of Propranolol Hydrochloride. J. Pharm. Sci., 104, 4365–4372.
- Adams, M.J., Muller, M.A. and Seville, J.P.K. (1994). Agglomerate strength measurement using an uniaxial confined compression test. Powder technology 78.5-90.
- Adetunji, O.A. and Olopha, V.A. (2021). Material and Compressional Properties of Two-Step Modified Plantain and Corn Starches. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Innovation Vol. 14. No. 1: 1-11.
- Adetunji, O.A. (2019). Chemically Modified Starches as Excipients in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms. In Emeje, M. (Ed.). Chemical Properties of Starch. Intechopen. 01-09pp. ISBN 978-1-83880-116-8
- Adetunji, O.A., Ajakore, O.M. and Itiola, O.A. (2022). Effects of Carboxymethylated Entandophragma angolense gum on the Mechanical and Release Properties of Ibuprofen Tablets. German Journal of Pharmaceuticals and Biomaterials, Vol. 1. No. 1: 44-53
- Adetunji, O.A., Odeniyi M.A., Oridupa, O.O. and Itiola O.A. (2012). The effect of formulation techniques and particle size reduction on the mucoadhesive and binding properties of Entandophragma angolense gum (Family: Meliaceae). Proceedings of the PAN Africa Summer School on Nanomedicine. 2012. Swai, H. and Nyamboli, B. Eds. Pretoria, South Africa. 51
- Alur, H.H., Pather, S.I., Mitra, A. K. and Johnston, T. P. (1999). Evaluation of the gum Hakea gibbosa as a sustained-release and Mucoadhesive component in buccal tablets. Pharmaceutical Development and Technology 4:347-358.
- Ameye D, Musa D, Foreman P, Remona JP. (2005). Spray-dried Amioca® starch/Carbopol® 974P mixtures as buccal bioadhesive carriers. Int. J. Pharm. 301: 170–180.
- Bagirei, S.Y., Mohammad,Y.S., Maude, M.M., Abdulkadir, F. and Yakub, M.M. (2021) Determination of Functional Properties and Moisture Sorption Isotherm of Dried Bean Flour. International journal of Science for Global Sustainability. Vol. 7 (2), 01-08
- Chopra, S.; Mahdi, S.; Kaur, J.; Iqbal, Z.; Talegaonkar, S.; Ahmad, F.J. (2006) Advances and potential applications of chitosan derivatives as mucoadhesive biomaterials in modern drug delivery. J. Pharm. Pharmacol, 58, 1021–1032.
- Emeje, M.O., Isimi, C.Y. and Kunle, O.O. (2007). Evaluation of Okra gum as a dry binder in
- Paracetanol tablet formulations. African ournal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 2:16.
- Gaylord G., Sergio S. J., Benedicte A., Simon B., Guillaume K. (2022) Plastic Flow Under Shear-Compression at the Micron Scale-Application on Amorphous Silica at High Strain Rate. Journal of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, 74 (6), pp.2231-2237.
- Grabovac, V.; Guggi, D.; Bernkop-Schurch, A. (2005): Comparison of the mucoadhesive properties of varios polymers. Adv. Drug Del. Rev., v.57, n.11, p.1713-1723.
- Hang T. Ta, Nghia P. Truong, Andrew K. Whittaker, Thomas P. Davis & Karlheinz Peter (2017): The effects of particle size, shape, density and flow characteristics on particle margination to vascular walls in cardiovascular diseases, Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2017.1316262
- Kalu V.D., Odeniyi M.A., Jaiyeoba K.T. (2007) Matrix properties of a new plant gum in controlled drug delivery. Arch Pharm Res., 30(7):884-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02978841. PMID: 17703742.
- Kararli T.T. (1995): Comparison of the gastrointestinal anatomy, physiology and biochemistry of humans and commonly used laboratory animals. Biopharm. Drug Dispos., 16: 351-380
- Kumar R., and Khatkar B.S. (2017): Thermal, pasting and morphological properties of starch granules of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 54(8):2403–2410. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-017-2681-x.
- Lin, C., and Cham, T. (1995). Compression behavior and tensile strength of heat treated polyethylene glycols. International Journal of Pharmacy 118:169-179.
- Luis A. Bello-Pérez, Edith Agama-Acevedo, Paul B. Zamudio-Flores, Guadalupe Mendez-Montealvo, Sandra L. Rodriguez-Ambriz, (2010): Effect of low and high acetylation degree in the morphological, physicochemical and structural characteristics of barley starch, LWT - Food Science and Technology, Volume 43, Issue 9,Pages 1434-1440,
- Mary-Ann F. (2015) Development and evaluation of natural gum based ibuprofen matrix tablets for colonic drug delivery [dissertation]. Kumasi: Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology; 2015.
- Mathias N.R and Hussain M.A. (2010): Non-invasive systemic drug delivery: developability considerations for alternate routes of administration. J Pharm Sci. 2010 (1):1-20. doi: 10.1002/jps.21793. PMID: 19499570.
- Odeku, O.A. and Itiola, O.A. (2003). Evaluation of the effects of khaya gum on the mechanical and release properties of paracetamol tablets. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy 29.3: 311-320.
- Odeniyi, M.A., Atolagbe, F.M., Aina, O.O. and Adetunji, O.A. (2011). Evaluation of the Mucoadhesive Properties of Native and Modified Starches of the Root Tubers of Cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium). African Journal of Biomedical Research Vol.14. No. 9: 169-174
- Olayemi, O.J., Adetunji, O.A. and Isimi, C.Y. (2021). Physicochemical and Structural Characterization of Novel Starch from Neorautanenia mitis tubers. Polim. Med. Vol. 51. No. 1: 7-16.
- Pérez S, Bertoft E (2010) The molecular structures of starch components and their contribution to the architecture of starch granules: A comprehensive review. Starch/Stärke, 2010;62:389–420. doi:10.1002/star. 201000013
- Rahamatullah, S., Thakur, R.R.S., Martin, J.G., Woolfson A.D. and Donnelly, R.A. (2011). Mucoadhesive Drug Delivery Systems; an update. Journal of Pharmacy and Biological science 31:89-100.
- Singla AK, Chawla M, Singh A. (2000). Potential applications of carbomer in oral mucoadhesive controlled drug delivery system: a review. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 26: 913–924
- Tuovinen L, Ruhanen E, Kinnarinen T, Ronkko S, Pelkonen J, Urtti A, (2004): Starch acetate microparticles for drug delivery into retinal pigment epithelium—In vitro study. Journal of Controlled Release.;98(3):407-413
- USP (2011). The United States Pharmacopeial Convention, 2011