Contemporary Research Analysis Journal

The increasing integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into education has raised questions about its utilization in academic environments, particularly in STEM fields. This study focused on the utilization of AI-based tools among STEM students at Lagos State University. The research sought to determine the level of awareness, usage patterns, and perceptions of AI tools, with particular attention to whether AI could replace or assist human instructors. The study was guided by three research questions and two hypotheses centered on AI’s impact on research and education. A descriptive survey research design was adopted, with a population comprising STEM students across different academic levels. A sample size of 150 respondents was selected through stratified random sampling. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire, validated with a reliability index of 0.82. The analysis was conducted using descriptive and inferential statistics. The results indicated that 95.1% of the respondents had utilized AI tools, with ChatGPT being the most commonly used. Students generally found AI tools effective in enhancing their research outcomes, but challenges such as technical difficulties and limited access were prevalent. Furthermore, while students acknowledged AI’s potential to assist educators, a majority emphasized that AI should not replace human instructors due to its lack of human empathy and adaptability. The study concluded that AI-based tools are beneficial for research and education, but there is a need for improved access and training. It was recommended that educational institutions invest in AI tools and ensure that students receive adequate training to enhance their research skills while maintaining a balance between AI usage and human-led learning.

Artificial Intelligence, STEM education, AI-based tools, student perception, academic research

1. Anih, P. A., & Ukeh, B. S. (2023). E-learning and AI in education. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 5(1), 15-29.
2. Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Utilization of AI in education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 80-97.
3. Ariyibi, A. A. (2021). The impact of technological interventions on student engagement and performance in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology, 18(3), 45-56.
4. Bawa, P. (2016). Personalized learning environments and their impact on student engagement and achievement. International Journal of Educational Research, 75, 123-135.
5. Byrne, R., & Callaghan, J. (2014). Complex systems and AI integration in education. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 110-124.
6. Dutsina, D., Tanbayal, E., & Sabitu, K. (2020). Gender and technology: Analyzing online learning success among university students. Technology in Education, 24(2), 34-49.
7. European Commission. (2019). Educational agendas for ICT integration.
8. Fernández-Gutiérrez, M., Lawrence, S., & Tar, U. (2020). Trends in educational technology investments. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(2), 1–15.
9. Gaol, F. L., & Prasolova-Førland, E. (2021). Digital technologies and education: A global perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 2781–2800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10506-7
10. González-Gómez, D., Asto, R., & Rojas, R. (2012). Female students and e-learning: A survey of attitudes and preferences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(2), 174-183.
11. Kashu, I. (2014). Exploring the performance differences between male and female students in online learning environments. Journal of Distance Education, 29(4), 40-53.
12. Kisigot, A., Ogula, A., & Munyua, G. (2021). Understanding gender dynamics in technology adoption among university students. International Journal of Educational Studies, 8(2),  98-110.
13. Lawrence, S., & Tar, U. (2018). ICT integration in education systems: Current trends and future directions. International Journal of Educational Technology, 14(4), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijet.2018.09.004
14. Mayer, R. E. (2015). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
15. Monte-Serrat, D., & Cattani, D. (2021). The role of AI in future technologies. Journal of AI Research, 11(2), 52-67.
16. Moreno, R. (2006). Learning in a multimedia world: The role of the modality effect. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 181-183.
17. Okobia, O. (2022). The effects of advanced e-learning approaches on academic achievement and problem-solving ability. Educational Technology Research and Development,                70(4), 789-806.
18. Powers, D. (2022). The influence of AI on global development. Globalization and Technology, 29(2), 215-229.
19. Rapoport, A. (1986). System perspective in education and AI. Systems Research, 3(1), 18-35.
20. Savage, R. (2020). AI in industry: Transformative technologies. AI & Robotics Journal, 9(1), 101-120.
21. Siemens, G. (2013). The role of AI in research innovations. Journal of Research and Innovation in Learning Technologies, 21(3), 75-89.
22. VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197-207.
23. Volti, R. (2009). Technology and society: A philosophical perspective. New York, NY: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
24. Wangu, R. (2014). Gender differences in academic performance in online learning environments: A review. Journal of Online Learning Research, 1(1), 23-45.
25. Zafar, A., Rehman, A., & Amin, A. (2018). Automated grading systems: The future of assessment in education. Computers & Education, 127, 150-160.