Urban Resilience-Power Nexus: Extending Institutional Bricolage in Urban Socio-Ecological Resilience

Author's Information:

Tomi Setiawan

Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia 

Hilman A. Halim

Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia 

Fuad Azmi

Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia 

Vol 02 No 09 (2025):Volume 02 Issue 09 September 2025

Page No.: 560-569

Abstract:

This study examines the relationship between patron–client relations and urban socio-ecological resilience in Indonesia, with a focus on how informal power structures influence community adaptive capacities. The analysis integrates Urban Political Ecology (UPE) and Social-Ecological Systems (SES) perspectives to address the theoretical blind spot that often neglects power dynamics in resilience studies. An Integrated Literature Review (ILR) was conducted using a modified PRISMA protocol, synthesizing 28 selected studies from both international and national academic databases. Findings reveal three major typologies of urban patronage, land control, informal sector arrangements, and infrastructure projects, each producing distinct implications for ecological resilience. Patronage networks can exacerbate vulnerabilities through practices such as green space conversion and groundwater exploitation, yet they may also serve adaptive functions by facilitating rapid resource distribution during crises. Building on these insights, the study proposes a new conceptual framework, the Urban Resilience–Power Nexus, which highlights the role of patronage density, access to critical resources, and local institutional capacities in shaping resilience outcomes. The study concludes that patron–client relations should not be viewed solely as obstacles; instead, they can be harnessed as institutional raw materials for sustainable governance. Policy implications emphasize strengthening local institutions, introducing ecological performance-based incentives, and promoting co-governance approaches that integrate patronage networks into formal governance structures.

KeyWords:

urban, resilience-power nexus, patronage, power dynamics, institutional bricolage

References:

  1. Ambarwati, R. T. (2024). "Kuku Berkarat": Ketimpangan Nasib Petani Tambak di Kawasan Delta Mahakam. Lembaran Antropologi, 3(2), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.22146/LA.17675
  2. Babbington, A. (2022). Political Ecologies of Urban Resilience: A Systematic Review. Routledge.
  3. Bakker, K. (2010). Privatizing Water: Governance Failure and the World’s Urban Water Crisis. Cornell University Press.
  4. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2018). Analyzing Social Networks. SAGE Publications.
  5. BPS. (2023). Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia 2023. Badan Pusat Statistik.
  6. Bowles, S. (2008). Microeconomics: Behavior, Institutions, and Evolution. Princeton University Press.
  7. Cleaver, F. (2002). Reinventing institutions: Bricolage and the social embeddedness of natural resource management. European Journal of Development Research, 14(2), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/714000425
  8. Dovey, K., & King, R. (2011). Forms of informality: Morphology and visibility of informal settlements. Habitat International, 35(3), 482–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.03.007
  9. Flick, U. (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection. SAGE Publications.
  10. Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03610-150420
  11. Hudalah, D. (2017). Peri-urbanization in Asia: Transformation and Governance. Cities, 0 492–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.010
  12. Khan, M. H. (2018). Political Settlements and the Analysis of Institutions. African Affairs, 117(469), 636–655. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/ady044
  13. Kooy, M. (2014). Developing Informality: The Production of Jakarta’s Urban Waterscape. Water Alternatives, 7(1), 35–53.
  14. Lebel, L., Anderies, J. M., Campbell, B., Folke, C., Hatfield-Dodds, S., Hughes, T. P., & Wilson, J. (2006). Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01606-110119
  15. McCarthy, J. F. (2016). The Oil Palm Complex: Smallholders, Agribusiness and the State in Indonesia and Malaysia. NUS Press.
  16. Meerow, S., Newell, J. P., & Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
  17. Nirwono, J. (2021). Informal Power and Spatial Control in Jakarta. University of Indonesia Press.
  18. Nurhayati, A. (2022). The Price of Protection: Patron-Client Relations in Urban Indonesia. Cambridge University Press.
  19. Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133
  20. Ribot, J. C. (2004). Waiting for Democracy: The Politics of Choice in Natural Resource Decentralization. World Resources Institute.
  21. Robbins, P. (2012). Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
  22. Setiawan, T., Samith, M. F., & Mughits, M. H. (2025). The Sustainable Development Nexus (SDN): Delivering Environmental Innovation Technologies (EITs) for Community Ecological Resilience (CER) in Indonesia. Scientia. Technology, Science and Society, 2(1), 111-132. https://doi.org/10.59324/stss.2025.2(1).09
  23. Setiawan, T, Halim H.A, Azmi, F. (2025). Resilience-Power Nexus for Sustainable Rural Livelihoods in Indonesia. Social Science and Human Research Bulletin, 02(08), 408–415. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16835714
  24. Shatkin, G. (2016). The real estate turn in policy and planning: Land monetization and the political economy of peri-urbanization in Asia. Cities, 53, 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.01.009
  25. Shatkin, G. (2023). Speculative Urbanism: Patronage Networks and Land Conversion in Southeast Asia. MIT Press.
  26. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
  27. Taylor, M. (2015). The Political Ecology of Climate Change Adaptation. Routledge.
  28. Templier, M., & Paré, G. (2015). A framework for guiding and evaluating literature reviews. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03706
  29. vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Riemer, K., Plattfaut, R., & Cleven, A. (2009). Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process. ECIS 2009 Proceedings, 161. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2009/161
  30. World Bank. (2021). Indonesia Urban Resilience Report: Informal Networks and Adaptive Capacity. World Bank Publications.